|
What the Law Says - The State's power to administer health insurance The Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector Authority has the duty to set up and authorize healthcare plans and providers. The law was written and sold to the legislature on the basis of skewed numbers, biased reports and studies paid for by the big insurance companies and providers. There are
six Massachusetts-based, non-profit health insurance companies that carry the Health Connector’s “Seal of Approval” plans available to a specific income bracket of individuals and families. The cost of these plans is also dependent on age, where a resident resides, gender and profession. They are also available to certain employers in the state. These 6 carriers are the biggest and richest in the state and also paid for the research that justified this law. These companies spent over $7.5 million lobbying on Beacon Hill to get this bill passed. See "Crowd out". Although they are officially "non-profit," they pay huge salaries to their upper-level employees and spend vast amounts on such wasteful practices as marketing and advertising while, at the same time, raising premiums well above |
|
||||||||||
|
Massachusetts-style health insurance |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
the rate of inflation every year. William van Fassen, CEO of Blue Cross Blue Shield, retired in late 2007 with $16.4 million in retirement benefits after having been paid a multi-million dollar salary before retirement. Do an Internet search and see how much insurance company execs make, and don’t forget that they have stellar health insurance and great Golden Parachutes - which reminds us - the Massachusetts health insurance law allows board members of the Connector to receive pension benefits. Those
of lesser means (Commonwealth Care) are limited to five insurance plans,
all with limited coverage territory. These are: What the Law Says - Primary Care Physician Shortage and the HMO business model All Commonwealth plans are based on the HMO (managed care) business model, which requires a primary care physician. What this means A shortage of primary-care physicians existed in Massachusetts prior to this law. This problem has been exacerbated by the influx of newly-insured residents combined with the fact that many doctors will not accept Commonwealth Care or MassHealth members because the reimbursement rate is very low - they can’t afford to add staff and/or cover their overhead and support their families. There is also an enormous amount of paperwork and phone time involved because every procedure and lab must be approved. One doctor we spoke with recently said that he can spend an hour on the phone obtaining an OK from a CSR in Texas and be reimbursed next to nothing, so he had to make the hard decision to stop accepting
subsidized plan members in order to have the time to focus on his other patients. “Difficulties finding a physician were much more common for low-income than higher-income residents. And adults with state-subsidized health insurance were much more likely to be told that a physician was not taking their type of insurance - 24 percent - compared with those with private insurance, 7 percent.” Boston Globe, May 28, 2009. Many residents cannot continue to maintain their relationships with a specialist or hospital because neither are in the plan where the resident resides, or the specialist doesn’t take subsidized plan members. This is not good for continuum of care or patient morale. Some residents who want to continue seeing their primary care or specialist have to opt out of paying for the insurance in order to put aside money for their doctor visits and must also figure out how to ration their care because this is expensive. We agree wholeheartedly. Three years into mandated health insurance, and neither the Connector or the Massachusetts legislators have even made a dent regarding this issue. Massachusetts taxpayers were told this law was put into place so people would have access to preventative care. What we have described in this section is a definite barrier to care. I doubt this issue has been thoroughly considered for the national plan either. Just get ‘em covered as fast as possible; we’ll worry about making it work later. Health care reform can’t wait. The HMO managed-care scheme is supposed to be more efficient and save money but in reality is complicated, bureaucratic and prone to reduce patient care to numbers and paperwork rather than actual hands-on care. This system benefits the insurer at the expense of the patient. The Connector "Seal of Approval" provides a near monopoly - all Commonwealth health insurance plans are HMO-based organizations. It is well understood by both the healthcare-consuming public and medical providers that the HMO business model's objective is to restrict rather than enable care. |
|
»
Read the next "What the Law Says" topic |
|
|
|
The Individual Mandate explained / The Connector Authority / Affordability / The Appeals Process |
|
Religious Exemption / Income estimation / Tax enforcement and Criminal penalties / Data Gathering |
|
Estate Recovery / Insurance plan "lock-in" / State as health insurance / Primary Care Shortage |
|
|
|
|